I sometimes see exclusion criteria in papers expressed as weight for length (WFL) < 75% or <80% of WHO reference median. I can't figure out how to convert this to z-scores, so can't figure out what subjects the paper is studying.
Apologies if this is an old question - I see some discussion on this some years back, but I haven't managed to find an answer.
Many thanks.
Dear Bindi,
We had a similar discussion previously on how to convert percentile estimates to WHO GS z-score, with the conclusion that it is probably not mathematically possible:
https://www.en-net.org/question/2888.aspx
If you are able to access the raw data, then the z-scores can be calculated.
Best wishes,
Tamsin
Answered:
5 years agoThanks Tamsin.
I don't have the raw data. But I did see this (not in the articles):
"All children with weight less than 80% of the median weight of children with the same height in the reference population, and/or suffering from Oedema, are classified as GAM. The World Health Organization describes Moderate Acute Malnutrition (MAM) as GAM in the 79% - 70% range, and Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM) as GAM below 70%."
Do you understand that to mean that 79% - 70% would correspond to WHZ -2 to -3, and below 70% would correspond to WHZ< -3?
Thanks again.
bindi
Answered:
5 years agoHi Bindi,
Percentage of the median does not correspond precisely with z-scores as they are calculated differently. See these explanations from LSHTM: http://conflict.lshtm.ac.uk/page_123.htm.
However, in the past, percentage of the median was often used with the cut-offs you mention to admit children aged 6-59 months into acute malnutrition management programmes.
This article might be useful to understand the discrepancy between the measures and how they were used historically: https://www.ennonline.net/fex/1/practical
I hope this helps you a little in interpreting the papers you are reading.
Best wishes,
Tamsin
Answered:
5 years agoHi Bindi
How does percentage of median weight relate to weight-for scores?
There is not a direct translation between percentage of median and Z-scores, but we can use the LMS values given in the WHO tables for WFH to calculate the Z-score for individual length/height and weight measurement. For example, using the WHO WFH table for girls at https://www.who.int/childgrowth/standards/wfh_girls_2_5_zscores.txt we see that the median weight for a girl of height 79cm is 10.0Kg. Eighty percent of 10Kg is 8.0Kg, which is between -3 and -2 Z-scores:
We can use the standard formula to calculate the exact Z-score from a weight that is 80% of the median weight for a girl who is 79cm tall:
Z = (((WEIGHT/M) ^ L) -1) / (L*S)
Z = (((8/10) ^ -0.3833) -1) / (-0.3833*0.08943) = -2.60 Z-scores.
For 80% of median weight, the first term in the equation (Weight/M) will always be 0.8. But the L and S values are different for different heights. This means that at other values for height, a girl with a weight that is 80% of the median weight will have a different Z score.
I plotted Z score values for 80%, 75% and 70% of median weight for girls covered by this table, 2 to 5 years old across heights between 65cm and 120cm. For these girls, 80% of median weight varies around -2.6 to -2.4Z; 75% of median weight varies around -3.4 to -3.1Z; and 70% of median weight varies around -4.3 to -3.9Z.
Hope that's of some help.
All the best
Jay
Answered:
5 years agoMany thanks Tamsin and Jay. That was very helpful.
bindi
Answered:
5 years ago