What are the costs/benefits of using RUTF in MAM HIV positive clients? In a situation where there are no operational SFPs, should RUTF be recommended?
In Malawi the old CMAM guidelines recommended the admission of children with HIV for treatment in OTP (with RUTF) when WFH <80% (NCHS) or MUAC < 12.5cm (I.e. MAM).
This was related to HIV+ children having a higher rate of mortality. This guidance may have changed since the admission criteria for OTP have changed to MUAC <11.5cm and WHZ <-3 (WHO). In other countries HIV + children are treated according to the same criteria as HIV - children. If you have the resources then there is no contraindication to using RUTF in the absence of an SFP. I am sure that practitioners based in Malawi are likely to have data on child survival (or cost-benefit) that you are looking for.
Answered:
9 years agoAnswered:
9 years agoAnswered:
9 years agoAnswered:
9 years ago